This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/

[address-policy-wg] Re: [ipv6-wg] IPv6 micro allocation or something else?

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: IPv6 PI
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] closed network and need for global uniqe IP space

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Carlos Morgado chbm at chbm.net
Sat Dec 3 00:35:04 CET 2005

On 18 Nov 2005 15:44:20, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Carsten Schiefner:
> 
> > of course, I can't speak for every DNS operator, but DENIC denying the
> > transfer of the .de zone has no other reason than data protection, ie.
> > making the harvesting of contact data of some 9 million plus domain name
> > holders by just piping the zone through the whois impossible.
> 
> Your claim is absurd.  The real privacy issue comes form forced
> publication of WHOIS data.  As a member of the DENIC executive board,
> you certainly know that, so please stop spreading such misinformation.
> 

No, your "get back our stuff on edonkey" plan is absurd. Next time could you  
please make your idea a little bit funny so we can all have a laugh ? Thank  
you.

-- 
Carlos Morgado - chbm(a)ma.ssive.net - http://chbm.net/0x1FC57F0A FP:0A27  
35D3 C448 3641 0573 6876 2A37 4BB2 1FC5 7F0A

Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] Re: IPv6 PI
Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg] closed network and need for global uniqe IP space

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]