[ipv6-wg] Re: Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Andre's guide to fix IPv6

On Fri, 2 Dec 2005 12:34:10 +0300, "Max Tulyev" <president at ukraine.su>
said:
[snip]
> 
> In this example I'm providing hosting and no more than hosting. No
> telecoms, 
> no transit channels, no ADSL. May be domain registration.
> 
> To make that business success I need to be multihomed (no objections at
> this 
> point, I think?). 

Try a different angle; assume you can get decent (redundant)
connectivity 
to one provider and thus almost as reliable as if you're sitting in
their
core network. If you still require multihoming, don't your arguments 
implicitly disqualify your upstream as a hosting-provider too
(regardless of
them being multihomed and/or peering at any tier)?  Who can then be 
trusted to run hosting-operations? Only multihomed as'es with no
downstreams?

(*duck*)

//per

-- 
  Per Heldal
  heldal at eml.cc