This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: [dns-wg] IPv6 in .ie
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: [dns-wg] IPv6 in .ie
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: [dns-wg] IPv6 in .ie
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Daniel Karrenberg
daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net
Wed Sep 8 10:19:43 CEST 2004
On 08.09 09:57, Andrei Robachevsky wrote: > But also the IANA procedure will not permit it: > > "5. If the number of name servers or IP addresses in the delegation > exceeds eight (8), the size of responses to reasonable queries with the > intended delegation will be checked to ensure that such responses fit > into a 512 byte UDP packet. This is the standard size limitation for UDP > response packets for most resolving name server software on the Internet > today." That is correct. It depends what a reasonable query is. If I was IANA I would advise .ie strongly to rationalise the names in their glue to save space. However, my point is that exceeding this limit will not cause the sky to fall down. Daniel
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: [dns-wg] IPv6 in .ie
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: [dns-wg] IPv6 in .ie
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]