This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] ICANN Board to implement IPv6 in root servers
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] ICANN Board to implement IPv6 in root servers
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] ICANN Board to implement IPv6 in root servers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Gert Doering
gert at space.net
Sun May 30 23:31:44 CEST 2004
Hi,
On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 03:48:10PM +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
> I agree in general with all your points, but I've seen already a couple of situations where someone was asking me for a IPv6-only network, and the lack of IPv6 in the root server created a problem, that of course has been solved hosting the DNS somewhere
Offering your client a v4+v6 dual-stacked recursive resolver should
solve most of their DNS needs for now.
As Johan pointed out: what good is v6 transport to the root *today*, while
99.9% of all name servers that actually server SLD zones don't have
v6 transport?
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 60210 (58081)
SpaceNet AG Mail: netmaster at Space.Net
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Tel : +49-89-32356-0
80807 Muenchen Fax : +49-89-32356-299
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] ICANN Board to implement IPv6 in root servers
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] ICANN Board to implement IPv6 in root servers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]