This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] ICANN Board to implement IPv6 in root servers
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] ICANN Board to implement IPv6 in root servers
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] ICANN Board to implement IPv6 in root servers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Sun May 30 14:50:25 CEST 2004
On 30-mei-04, at 14:30, Johan Ihren wrote: >> proceed with adding AAAA glue [name server] records to the >> delegations of those TLDs that request it, >> And what about the root servers themselves? > Well, what about them? > Not that I'm particularly against v6 transport to the roots, but I'd > be curious to know exactly what problem you believe that you would > solve that way. Well, what problem does having v6 glue records for tld delegations solve? If the whole chain is IPv6-capable that means you no longer have to depend on v4 connectivity to reach v6 sites. Eventually we'll want to switch off v4 because of the support costs, of course. But in the mean time this means better protection against connectivity problems.
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] ICANN Board to implement IPv6 in root servers
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] ICANN Board to implement IPv6 in root servers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]