This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/ipv6-wg@ripe.net/
[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Actual IPv6 traffic
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Actual IPv6 traffic
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Actual IPv6 traffic
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Tim Chown
tjc at ecs.soton.ac.uk
Tue May 4 11:18:02 CEST 2004
On Tue, May 04, 2004 at 10:18:06AM +0200, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote: > From the agenda: > > >C. Report(s) about *actual* v6 traffic volume as compared to v4? > > *what's real* out there, not what's on powerpoint? > > (input from the audience) > > My input in advance: > Totals 24925 ( 96.49%) 908 ( 3.51%) 25833 Hi, The IPv6 Cluster site at www.ist-ipv6.org for April 2004 had 3,460 visits of which 309 (8.9%) were over IPv6. This as a ratio is down from the peak in Jan 2004 where we had 3,520 visits, of which 568 (16.2%) were over IPv6. Probably due to the Global IPv6 Launch event in Brussels. This is a pretty niche v6 site, so you'd expect more v6 visitors than anywhere else. Tim
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Actual IPv6 traffic
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Actual IPv6 traffic
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]