[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] New IPv6 Address Block Allocated to RIPE NCC

On Wed, 2004-06-16 at 19:23, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> 
> On 2004-06-14, at 15.43, Carlos Friacas wrote:
> 
> > It really doesnt seem right that the RIRs have to be constantly asking 
> > for
> > more space -- and moreover unaggregated blocks, making everybody to 
> > mess
> > up with their filters frequently... :-(
> 
> So after a hallway discussion yesterday with some people at the NAv6TF 
> meeting, why don't RIPE just apply for a /8 from IANA. From what we 
> could figure there is nothing that prevents RIPE from doing this,p and 
> that would force the discussion.
> 
> I am all for it.

Or like NIKE says: Just do it.

And give ARIN + APNIC + LACNIC + AFRINIC a /8 too.
AFRINIC and LACNIC won't be able to 'justify' it that easily but they
will *never* (I hope ;) run out, even if every single tree that is still
standing in the rainforests get a /64 ;)

Greets,
 Jeroen

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 240 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20040617/b5b964dc/attachment.sig>