This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?)

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?)
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?)

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Daniel Roesen dr at cluenet.de
Thu Jul 22 16:33:13 CEST 2004

On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 04:20:17PM +0200, Daniel Roesen wrote:
> So file an complain to Red Hat and get it fixed.
> 
> (it is already in Rawhide, see
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101261)
> 
> BTW, current glibc for FC1 does bitstring.arpa and nibble.int queries.
> Current rawhide glibc should do both nibble-style.

Better reference:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111059#c2

So if you want proper IPv6 reverse resolution on FC1, upgrade glibc
to current rawhide version or wait for the next glibc update for FC1.

But this is all implementation details, so off-topic here.


Regards,
Daniel

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?)
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?)

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]