This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: [sig-ipv6] 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?)
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Anand Kumria
wildfire at progsoc.uts.edu.au
Thu Jul 22 10:57:28 CEST 2004
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 10:10:19AM +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote: > [ Cross-post, to get everybody in sync, > Other messages in this thread can be found at: > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail-archives/ipv6-wg/2004/msg00089.html ] > > On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 09:58, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote: > > > On 2004-07-22, at 09.43, Jeroen Massar wrote: > > > > > But indeed, if there is concensus or not 9/9/2004 and ip6.int is gone > > > for me. > > > > I vote for 9/9/2004 and getting rid of it properly. Maintaining two > > reverse threes will create more problems than it will solve. What, specifically, is the hurry? > > Take your pick: > > http://unfix.org/~jeroen/archive/drafts/draft-massar-v6ops-ip6int-removal-00.html > http://unfix.org/~jeroen/archive/drafts/draft-massar-v6ops-ip6int-removal-00.txt > http://unfix.org/~jeroen/archive/drafts/draft-massar-v6ops-ip6int-removal-00.xml > > Short, quick and easy. > If no comments are risen for 16:00 today I'll submit this as an ID. Comments: e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa was documented in RFC3681 published in February 2004 and actioned in July 2004. I'm assuming the actioning of e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa is the trigger for this I-D; if so, why do you want to wait so little time (2 months) between e.f.f.3.ip6.arpa becoming available and requiring people to have updated resolver libraries? Personally I'd be more in favour of a 6 month timeout - i.e around last December or so. Anand -- `` All actions take place in time by the interweaving of the forces of Nature; but the man lost in selfish delusion thinks that he himself is the actor.'' Lord Krishna to Arjuna in _The Bhagavad Gita_
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?)
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?)
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]