This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?)

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?)
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?)

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Daniel Roesen dr at cluenet.de
Thu Jul 22 12:59:29 CEST 2004

On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 12:35:02PM +0200, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:
> While 9/9/2004 might be optimistic, just as Iljitsch points out, we 
> will not have a RFC by then, June 6th 2006 seems to far away for me. 
> End of the year or mid 2005 by the latest seems more realistic.

Agreed. The period of coexistence of both trees should be kept as short
as possible to avoid confusion and fostering lazyness. Half a year is
more than enough to get delegations in ip6.arpa done.


Regards,
Daniel

• Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?)
• Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?)

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ ipv6-wg Archives ]