[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] 9/9/2004 IP6.INT Removal (Was: 9/9/2006 : ip6.int shutdown?)

Jeroen, all,

Jeroen Massar wrote:
> [ Cross-post, to get everybody in sync,
> Other messages in this thread can be found at:
> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail-archives/ipv6-wg/2004/msg00089.html ]
> 
> On Thu, 2004-07-22 at 09:58, Kurt Erik Lindqvist wrote:
> 
> 
>>On 2004-07-22, at 09.43, Jeroen Massar wrote:
>>
>>
>>>But indeed, if there is concensus or not 9/9/2004 and ip6.int is gone
>>>for me.
>>
>>I vote for 9/9/2004 and getting rid of it properly. Maintaining two 
>>reverse threes will create more problems than it will solve.
> 
> 
> Take your pick:
> 
> http://unfix.org/~jeroen/archive/drafts/draft-massar-v6ops-ip6int-removal-00.html
> http://unfix.org/~jeroen/archive/drafts/draft-massar-v6ops-ip6int-removal-00.txt
> http://unfix.org/~jeroen/archive/drafts/draft-massar-v6ops-ip6int-removal-00.xml
> 
> Short, quick and easy.
> If no comments are risen for 16:00 today I'll submit this as an ID.
>


We were discussing possible ways of ip6.int phaseout with other RIRs, 
and one approach was presented at the last RIPE meeting in May 
(http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-48/presentations/ripe48-dns-reverse-ipv6.pdf). 
It is a bit less radical than yours.

Description of the plan is attached.


> Greets,
>  Jeroen
> 

Regards,

Andrei

-- 
Andrei Robachevsky
RIPE NCC

-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: ip6-int-phaseout.txt
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-wg/attachments/20040722/97cec59d/attachment.txt>