This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: /48 micro allocations for v6 root servers, was: national security
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: /48 micro allocations for v6 root servers, was: national security
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] RE: /48 micro allocations for v6 root servers, was: national security
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Iljitsch van Beijnum
iljitsch at muada.com
Tue Dec 16 15:20:54 CET 2003
On 16-dec-03, at 12:06, jfcm wrote: > I suggest ISO should define an international trans network numbering > scheme that could be adopted as the IPv6.010 numbering plan, the same > way as the ccTLD list is the ISO 3166 2 letters list, and IDNA uses > unicodes etc. The ISO is already in charge of NSAP addresses. I don't see how importing the complexity that exists there into IP is going to help us. > This would relieve IETF from these user, political, etc. oriented > inapropriate controversies. There is very little, if any, controversy in IPv6 addressing. Ask for address space and you'll get it. Moving addressing issues to a new organization would in fact create controversy as it is virtually guaranteed that address policies and routing policies will fall out of alignment, to the detriment of the net as a whole.
- Previous message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] Re: /48 micro allocations for v6 root servers, was: national security
- Next message (by thread): [ipv6-wg at ripe.net] RE: /48 micro allocations for v6 root servers, was: national security
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ ipv6-wg Archives ]