[ipv6-hackathon] Projects & teams!
Stephen D. Strowes sds at ripe.net
Tue Oct 31 17:52:44 CET 2017
On 31/10/2017 16:17, Shahin Gharghi wrote: > There are some good ideas and I'd love to work on them. By the way > these are some bubbles on my mind: > > -Comparing more-specific routes announced by IPv4 and IPv6 > One of our problems in BGP, is huge number of more-specific routes. > This number should be less because of gigantic > size of IPv6 prefixes. I think it is good to have a measurement tool > that compares number of IPv6 and IPv4 routes per > total allocated routes It's difficult to compare apples to oranges, but yes, tools to compare and summarise the v4 world to the v6 world as observed in BGP data would be interesting. (We've considered time-based comparisons in the past, but now I think about it, a v4/v6 comparison would be good too.) Maybe such tools exist already, but I often wind up doing things by hand. > -Guess percentage of IPv6 traffic by looking at public DNS servers > Mostly people use public DNS revolvers like google and openDNS. We can > check their databases and guess the percentage of IPv6 users and > traffic by total queries Although definitely not the same thing as what you suggest, a DNS-related measure is the query volume sent/rcvd over udp/tcp over ipv4/ipv6. Each of the root server operators publishes this; for example: http://a.root-servers.org/rssac-metrics/raw/2017/10/traffic-volume/a-root-20171029-traffic-volume.yaml I've played with this data in the past. The YAML output isn't always exactly the same, but they're pretty close. Data starts to look something like this: https://sdstrowes.co.uk/misc/v6dash/dns-v6-stats/udp.png > > -Make a tool to suggest potential neighbors around you for peering > This tool works for both IPv4 and IPv6. We can ask for an AS number > and check all of right neighbors of it's left peers and suggest them > to client for peering > > See you in Copenhagen. > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 2:14 PM, Vesna Manojlovic <BECHA at ripe.net > <mailto:BECHA at ripe.net>> wrote: > > Hi all, > > it is useful to present a project that you would like to suggest > for the > IPv6 hackathon, so that other people can join your team. > > There are some listed on the Etherpad already, mostly by Dave -- > who can > not even make it to the event itself! Thanks, Dave! > > https://pad.riseup.net/p/ripe_ncc-ipv6-hackathon > <https://pad.riseup.net/p/ripe_ncc-ipv6-hackathon> > > > Other ideas were floated in your introductions; and maybe on the IRC.. > > Let's try to narrow down the proposals to 5-7 projects, so that we can > save time on Saturday morning (Day 1)... by making very short > intro-talks, because people already got to know each other over > email ;-) > > So: either start a new thread with your project name; > or reply to this email & add some details.. > or write on EtherPad about your project.. ask people to add names.. > or.. get creative in some other way :) > > > Thanks, > Vesna > > _______________________________________________ > ipv6-hackathon mailing list > ipv6-hackathon at ripe.net <mailto:ipv6-hackathon at ripe.net> > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-hackathon > <https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-hackathon> > > > > > -- > Shahin Gharghi > > > _______________________________________________ > ipv6-hackathon mailing list > ipv6-hackathon at ripe.net > https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/ipv6-hackathon -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-hackathon/attachments/20171031/1f64c943/attachment.html>
