[ipv6-hackathon] Projects & teams!
Patterson, Richard (Sky Network Services (SNS)) Richard.Patterson at sky.uk
Wed Nov 1 10:53:21 CET 2017
I quite like this idea, but rather comparing BGP routes specifically, compare distance/performance to highlight prefixes with sub-optimal v6 routing. Similar to Google’s Latency measurement in their IPv6 stats page, but for a wider range of destinations other than just Google. IIRC last time I played with the Atlas probes, they could only trace to Anchors, is that still the case? -Richard From: ipv6-hackathon <ipv6-hackathon-bounces at ripe.net> on behalf of "Stephen D. Strowes" <sds at ripe.net> Date: Tuesday, 31 October 2017 at 16:52 To: Shahin Gharghi <shahin at gharghi.ir>, "ipv6-hackathon at ripe.net" <ipv6-hackathon at ripe.net> Subject: Re: [ipv6-hackathon] Projects & teams! On 31/10/2017 16:17, Shahin Gharghi wrote: There are some good ideas and I'd love to work on them. By the way these are some bubbles on my mind: -Comparing more-specific routes announced by IPv4 and IPv6 One of our problems in BGP, is huge number of more-specific routes. This number should be less because of gigantic size of IPv6 prefixes. I think it is good to have a measurement tool that compares number of IPv6 and IPv4 routes per total allocated routes It's difficult to compare apples to oranges, but yes, tools to compare and summarise the v4 world to the v6 world as observed in BGP data would be interesting. (We've considered time-based comparisons in the past, but now I think about it, a v4/v6 comparison would be good too.) Maybe such tools exist already, but I often wind up doing things by hand. Information in this email including any attachments may be privileged, confidential and is intended exclusively for the addressee. The views expressed may not be official policy, but the personal views of the originator. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete it from your system. You should not reproduce, distribute, store, retransmit, use or disclose its contents to anyone. Please note we reserve the right to monitor all e-mail communication through our internal and external networks. SKY and the SKY marks are trademarks of Sky plc and Sky International AG and are used under licence. Sky UK Limited (Registration No. 2906991), Sky-In-Home Service Limited (Registration No. 2067075) and Sky Subscribers Services Limited (Registration No. 2340150) are direct or indirect subsidiaries of Sky plc (Registration No. 2247735). All of the companies mentioned in this paragraph are incorporated in England and Wales and share the same registered office at Grant Way, Isleworth, Middlesex TW7 5QD. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ipv6-hackathon/attachments/20171101/b451d6eb/attachment.html>