[iot-wg] iot-wg Digest, Vol 59, Issue 4

I just wanted to add my support for Peter. It was a pleasure to work with
Peter and other members of the working group on the IoT Architectural
Considerations paper we released in April 2021.

Peter helped keep us organized and focused during the drafting and review
process.

-phil


On Sun, May 15, 2022 at 6:00 AM <iot-wg-request at ripe.net> wrote:

> Send iot-wg mailing list submissions to
>         iot-wg at ripe.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://mailman.ripe.net/
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         iot-wg-request at ripe.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         iot-wg-owner at ripe.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of iot-wg digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. [Peter Steinhaeuser] for co-chair (Peter Steinh?user)
>    2. Re: [Peter Steinhaeuser] for co-chair (fwd) Michael
>       Richardson: Re: [Peter Steinhaeuser] for co-chair (Michael
> Richardson)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 17:17:26 +0200
> From: Peter Steinh?user <ps at embedd.com>
> To: IoT WG RIPE <iot-wg at ripe.net>
> Subject: [iot-wg] [Peter Steinhaeuser] for co-chair
> Message-ID: <6A271EB2-9384-477F-9237-632AA7FC4F8A at embedd.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Dear collegues,
>
> I put my hat (again) into the ring and ask you to support me as a candiate
> for co-chairing this WG.
>
> I think that this WG is still trying to find it's place in the RIPE
> community, the overall acitivity level has beend a bit low. Of course the
> years of the pandemic and the lack of opportunities to meet in person were
> not helpful. Nevertheless it seems that IoT is still something that is
> often considered to live in the consumer space, and also many carriers
> currently seem to have other priorities.
>
> With the expanding support of IP for IoT connectivity - i.e. the Thread
> and Matter protcol - I think this WG can work more closely with the other
> RIPE WGs and should working on linkinf with other RIPE WGs and
> standardisation and industry entities to better understand what this RIPE
> WG can contribute.
>
> There are already activities (IETF home gateway WG, Telcom Infra Project)
> in this field and also carriers bit by bit seems to pay more attention to
> IoT. Industrial IoT is also getting traction and new technologies like LiFi
> are emerging. Such should also come this WG's attention and there's are
> strong tendency to move toward IP (in my understanding).
>
> As a WG chair I would focus working on connecting the ongoing activities
> to form technical standards and reference implementations for easy adoption
> by the industry. I would also work on advocating those to industry players
> (i.e. via Broadband Forum & prpl Foundation & Telcom Infrastructure Project
> - TIP) to get broader support for these activities as well. In my role as
> project manager for prplOS in the prpl Foundation I also propose
> technologies for adoption & funding by the prpl Foundation and it's
> members, as well as in the TIP project where we contribute technology and
> solutions to the Open Coverged Wireless WG (and recently started working on
> IoT integration as well).
>
> I would appreaciate your support for my standing for co-chair for this WG
> and supporting it's activities. I still think that this WG can make
> meaningful contributions - we had a good start with the BCOP document and
> it was a pleasure for me to work with the participating WG members.
>
> Sincerly,
> Peter Steinhaeuser
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: smime.p7s
> Type: application/pkcs7-signature
> Size: 6125 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <
> /ripe/mail/archives/iot-wg/attachments/20220514/de5807a6/attachment-0001.p7s
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 14:34:23 -0400
> From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf at sandelman.ca>
> To: iot-wg at ripe.net
> Subject: Re: [iot-wg] [Peter Steinhaeuser] for co-chair (fwd) Michael
>         Richardson: Re: [Peter Steinhaeuser] for co-chair
> Message-ID: <243044.1652553263 at dooku>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>
> Peter Steinh=C3=A4user <ps at embedd.com> wrote:
>     > I put my hat (again) into the ring and ask you to support me as a
>     > candiate for co-chairing this WG.
>
> I am very supportive of Peter doing this!
>
>     > I think that this WG is still trying to find it's place in the RIPE
>     > community, the overall acitivity level has beend a bit low. Of course
>     > the years of the pandemic and the lack of opportunities to meet in
>     > person were not helpful. Nevertheless it seems that IoT is still
>     > something that is often considered to live in the consumer space, and
>     > also many carriers currently seem to have other priorities.
>
> I thik that these are astute observations.
> I really enjoyed the RIPE79 (Rotterdam) IoT hackathon.
>
> I think that there are interesting operational things that RIPE IoT WG
> could
> have deeper converations about.  There will be a grandchild-of-HOMENET
> effo=
> rt
> at the IETF that might get called SNAC.  It would be interesting to me to
> do
> some kind of *interop* testing of IoT systems and ISP systems.
>
>     > As a WG chair I would focus working on connecting the ongoing
>     > activities to form technical standards and reference implementations
>     > for easy adoption by the industry. I would also work on advocating
>     > those to industry players (i.e. via Broadband Forum & prpl
> Foundation=
>  &
>     > Telcom Infrastructure Project - TIP) to get broader support for these
>     > activities as well.
> =20=20=20=20
>     > In my role as project manager for prplOS in the
>     > prpl Foundation I also propose technologies for adoption & funding by
>     > the prpl Foundation and it's members, as well as in the TIP project
>     > where we contribute technology and solutions to the Open Coverged
>     > Wireless WG (and recently started working on IoT integration as
> well).
>
> This kind of promotion of new open source systems and open-stand.org
> (standards) is really important to me as well.
>
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF at sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
>  -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 658 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <
> /ripe/mail/archives/iot-wg/attachments/20220514/bc1db635/attachment-0001.sig
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> iot-wg mailing list
> iot-wg at ripe.net
> https://mailman.ripe.net/
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change
> your subscription options, please visit:
> https://mailman.ripe.net/
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of iot-wg Digest, Vol 59, Issue 4
> *************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/iot-wg/attachments/20220517/90545b29/attachment-0001.html>