This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/iot-wg@ripe.net/
[iot-wg] [Peter Steinhaeuser] for co-chair
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] [Peter Steinhaeuser] for co-chair
- Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] [Peter Steinhaeuser] for co-chair (fwd) Michael Richardson: Re: [Peter Steinhaeuser] for co-chair
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Töma Gavrichenkov
ximaera at gmail.com
Mon May 16 20:01:19 CEST 2022
Peace, I, too, support Peter for the IoT WG Chair position. -- Töma On Sat, May 14, 2022, 5:17 PM Peter Steinhäuser <ps at embedd.com> wrote: > Dear collegues, > > I put my hat (again) into the ring and ask you to support me as a candiate > for co-chairing this WG. > > I think that this WG is still trying to find it's place in the RIPE > community, the overall acitivity level has beend a bit low. Of course the > years of the pandemic and the lack of opportunities to meet in person were > not helpful. Nevertheless it seems that IoT is still something that is > often considered to live in the consumer space, and also many carriers > currently seem to have other priorities. > > With the expanding support of IP for IoT connectivity - i.e. the Thread > and Matter protcol - I think this WG can work more closely with the other > RIPE WGs and should working on linkinf with other RIPE WGs and > standardisation and industry entities to better understand what this RIPE > WG can contribute. > > There are already activities (IETF home gateway WG, Telcom Infra Project) > in this field and also carriers bit by bit seems to pay more attention to > IoT. Industrial IoT is also getting traction and new technologies like LiFi > are emerging. Such should also come this WG's attention and there's are > strong tendency to move toward IP (in my understanding). > > As a WG chair I would focus working on connecting the ongoing activities > to form technical standards and reference implementations for easy adoption > by the industry. I would also work on advocating those to industry players > (i.e. via Broadband Forum & prpl Foundation & Telcom Infrastructure Project > - TIP) to get broader support for these activities as well. In my role as > project manager for prplOS in the prpl Foundation I also propose > technologies for adoption & funding by the prpl Foundation and it's > members, as well as in the TIP project where we contribute technology and > solutions to the Open Coverged Wireless WG (and recently started working on > IoT integration as well). > > I would appreaciate your support for my standing for co-chair for this WG > and supporting it's activities. I still think that this WG can make > meaningful contributions - we had a good start with the BCOP document and > it was a pleasure for me to work with the participating WG members. > > Sincerly, > Peter Steinhaeuser_______________________________________________ > iot-wg mailing list > iot-wg at ripe.net > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change > your subscription options, please visit: > https://mailman.ripe.net/ > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/iot-wg/attachments/20220516/dcc550b0/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] [Peter Steinhaeuser] for co-chair
- Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] [Peter Steinhaeuser] for co-chair (fwd) Michael Richardson: Re: [Peter Steinhaeuser] for co-chair
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]