This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[iot-wg] To be published: Architectural Considerations for IoT Device Security in the Home

• Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] To be published: Architectural Considerations for IoT Device Security in the Home
• Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] To be published: Architectural Considerations for IoT Device Security in the Home

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Töma Gavrichenkov ximaera at gmail.com
Fri Feb 12 14:42:14 CET 2021

Peace,

On Fri, Feb 12, 2021, 3:56 PM Constanze Dietrich <constanze.die at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Since RIPE 81, the "BCOP" document was refined again and now declared
> DONE under the title: "Architectural Considerations for IoT Device Security
> in the Home" (document attached).
>

Section 4 sort of implies that there are only two Layer 4 protocols.  It'd
be very nice if the final RIPE document doesn't have such implications.

--
Töma

>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/iot-wg/attachments/20210212/371443b2/attachment.html>

• Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] To be published: Architectural Considerations for IoT Device Security in the Home
• Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] To be published: Architectural Considerations for IoT Device Security in the Home

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ iot-wg Archives ]