This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/iot-wg@ripe.net/
[iot-wg] [IoT WG Focus]
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] [IoT WG Focus]
- Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] [IoT WG Focus]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
sandoche Balakrichenan
sandoche.balakrichenan at afnic.fr
Thu Apr 22 16:36:19 CEST 2021
Dear Peter, I completely agree with your views that the WG is not as active. The charter scope was the line of discussion, when the WG was formed : https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/iot-wg/2017-November/subject.html#226 With Constanze, we have discussed means to identify the the WG members requirements. Constanze had even sent a survey in this objective: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdVVq38C96Mn_Lv8eDgiHGzt3TgzPfx_MMQ4iMiORnM2zWBYg/viewform IMHO, we will keep the scope for the charter wide, but if there are activities focusing on a particular domain, it is always positive. Sandoche. On 22/04/2021 14:34, Peter Steinhäuser wrote: > Dear collegues, > > since this working group was founded I feel that it never really got > traction and struggled a bit to find it’s place in the RIPE community. > Also there is not much activity, despite the working group's chair’s > and some member’s efforts (hackathons, BCOP document, survey) to > motivate WG members to participate more actively. > > The WG’s charter covers a huge field of possible activities around IoT > while (to me it seems) other WG’s have more focus. I may be wrong but > I think that this lack of focus makes it more difficult for this WG to > organize joint activities. The majority of the activities of the > (technical) RIPE WG’s are centered around IP and IP based networks > therefore I think focusing on similar areas could help this WG to > become a more lively part of the RIPE community. > > An example could be analysis and research around the thread protocol > of the Project Connected Home over IP of the ZigBee Alliance. Based > upon IPv6 and with products from major players already shipping this > could be one possible field of activity that connects with other WG’s > areas of expertise. > > I would be glad to hear your opinions! > > Thanks and best regards, > Peter > *Peter Steinhäuser, CEO* > embeDD GmbH · Alter Postplatz 2 · 6370 Stans · Switzerland > Phone: +41 (41) 784 95 85 · Fax: +41 (41) 784 95 64 > > > _______________________________________________ > iot-wg mailing list > iot-wg at ripe.net > https://mailman.ripe.net/ -- Sandoche BALAKRICHENAN Head of R&D Partnerships @ Afnic LoRaWAN Academia WG Chair & RIPE IoT WG Co-Chair -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: </ripe/mail/archives/iot-wg/attachments/20210422/d6007d20/attachment.html>
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] [IoT WG Focus]
- Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] [IoT WG Focus]
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]