[iot-wg] IoT BCOP TF Document - Call for comments

Hi Eric,

On 26.10.20 14:33, Eric van Uden via iot-wg wrote:
> Hi Eliot,
>
> I´m refering to the Stacked Router concept, so one CPE instead of two
> (stacked) In this case, the CPE


Thanks.  It is better for a single provider to interface with the user. 
Stacked CPE should certainly not be required, but nor should it be
prohibited.  If I don't like the pizza box my provider gives me, I might
want to put something in front of it.  In that case, the maker of that
something might take responsibility for communicating with me about what
is going on in my network.  This has an impact as to whether or not
everything can be done in, say, TR.369.

Does this make sense?

Eliot




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/iot-wg/attachments/20201026/a7b621df/attachment.html>