This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/iot-wg@ripe.net/
[iot-wg] IoT BCOP TF Document - Call for comments
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] IoT BCOP TF Document - Call for comments
- Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] RIPE81 agenda and virtual meetup on 26 October
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Michael Richardson
mcr+ietf at sandelman.ca
Mon Oct 26 15:38:34 CET 2020
Eric van Uden via iot-wg <iot-wg at ripe.net> wrote: > For me this means that IoT security should be implemented in as little as > possible devices connection the consumer to the internet - one device if > at all possible thus avoiding stacked router scenarios that add > unnecessary complexity and possibly even more IoT security issues. Fewer devices are better, but on the other hand, getting it done is also important. Sometimes better is in the way of good enough? -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF at sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 487 bytes Desc: not available URL: </ripe/mail/archives/iot-wg/attachments/20201026/3c49708d/attachment.sig>
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] IoT BCOP TF Document - Call for comments
- Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] RIPE81 agenda and virtual meetup on 26 October
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]