This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[iot-wg] Constanze Dietrich for co-chair
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] Constanze Dietrich for co-chair
- Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] Constanze Dietrich for co-chair
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Matthias Waehlisch
m.waehlisch at fu-berlin.de
Fri Apr 24 10:33:54 CEST 2020
I worked with Constanze on the Rotterdam IoT Hackathon. This was productive. Support from my side! cheers matthias On Fri, 24 Apr 2020, Constanze Dietrich wrote: > > Hi everyone! > > > > It’s nice to see the support for Peter as I think he’s a well eligible candidate and I > agree with his approach on many levels. That said, I’d like to provide another option by > venturing to nominate myself! > > > > TL;DR: [Jump to the last paragraph! -->] > > > > Now mostly remembered for my comics, I was introduced to the RIPE community at RIPE 74 as > part of the RACI program and spoke about my master studies on human factors as security > risks in IT operations. Later that year, I was invited to talk at the first RIPE IoT > Roundtable Meeting in Leeds where I got to discuss the implications of my studies for the > IoT, as well as the implications of rapidly and diversely spreading IoT technologies for > the RIPE NCC – the latter of which shortly after has been moved to its own working group! > :) > > > > Meanwhile, I work for an IT management consultancy and have not seen a single strategy > paper without IoT as a focus topic. Having a considerable number of clients in the energy > sector, all of them urged onto the trail of “smart everything”, I’m well and truly > concerned about the various approaches they take as, one or two steps further, the > security impact on critical infrastructures even beyond the Internet could be disastrous. > > > > We do indeed need best practices and standards, which is why such endeavours will, by all > means, get my full support. Thereby though, we should not forget that, despite existing > standards, the IoT is still a huge playground and will continue to be for the foreseeable > future. “Internet all the things!”, whether or not there’s a quality seal attached. > Hence, to date and from my point of view as someone who studies more service contracts > than she’d like, I also see a very high value in creating governance concepts for IoT > networks. The role of ISPs in this, e.g. as a kill switch, has been discussed before, and > we should develop a position on responsibilities and liability within (and outside) those > infrastructures. > > > > [-->] My specific fields of interests aside, my main goal as a co-chair is to > enable the members of the working group to get into an active exchange – be it by > co-organising another IoT hackathon and presenting the results in the IoT session which > has been (a lot of work but also) a huge pleasure for me before and during RIPE 79, by > documenting and communicating topics of the WG (with or without comics), or by providing > the enterprise perspective and a link to a variety of industries that employ IoT > technologies. We’re a comparatively new and still somewhat inactive working group and I’d > like to change that. > > > > Cheers from Berlin! > > ~ Constanze > > > -- Matthias Waehlisch . Freie Universitaet Berlin, Computer Science .. http://www.cs.fu-berlin.de/~waehl
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] Constanze Dietrich for co-chair
- Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] Constanze Dietrich for co-chair
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]