This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/iot-wg@ripe.net/
[iot-wg] clarification on BEREC consultation
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] For information: ETSI releases IoT security standard
- Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] clarification on BEREC consultation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Thu Oct 17 15:03:58 CEST 2019
Peter kindly pointed out that my earlier mail today on this topic mistakenly quoted an ETSI thing, not the BEREC consultation. Apologies for any confusion. The morning coffee hadn't kicked in when I sent the email. Well that's my excuse and I'm sticking to it. The important thing is unchanged though. The Connnect WG is leading the effort on a community response to the BEREC consultation on identification of the network termination point. If members of the IoT WG have input to that community response, please raise them in the Connnect WG. We can of course discuss BEREC's ideas here. However that is unlikely to influence whatever community response emerges from the Connect WG.
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] For information: ETSI releases IoT security standard
- Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] clarification on BEREC consultation
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]