This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/iot-wg@ripe.net/

[iot-wg] algorithm agility for IoT

• Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] algorithm agility for IoT
• Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] algorithm agility for IoT

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Mat Ford ford at isoc.org
Mon Jan 21 14:29:39 CET 2019

Hi Jim,

> On 21 Jan 2019, at 12:53, Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote:
> 
> * It’s such basic common sense it isn’t written down anywhere. As least I’ve not been able to find it in a standards document yet. Which means that common sense can’t get baked into equipment procurements, RFPs and so on. So if there’s an RFC or ITU Recommendation or whatever along those lines...

See https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7696/

Mat

• Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] algorithm agility for IoT
• Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] algorithm agility for IoT

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ iot-wg Archives ]