This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[iot-wg] "The Internet of Threats: Fighting FUD with MUD"
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] "The Internet of Threats: Fighting FUD with MUD"
- Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] serious vulnerabilities FreeRTOS
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Töma Gavrichenkov
ximaera at gmail.com
Wed Oct 24 18:12:25 CEST 2018
Good day, On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 9:15 PM Eliot Lear <lear at lear.ch> wrote: > > The issue with smart homes, wearables etc. is that a contemporary > > commodity IoT device is not connected to the Internet in order to > > really provide a service to the customer. > > Huh? Explained in the next sentence. > > Instead, it collects, > > processes and sends data and telemetry which is precious for its > > vendor, which said vendor would then be able to sell. > > > You would not pay money for a device with such a purpose, much less let it on your network. So is MUD being designed for me personally? As for the rest of the customers, a majority of them will prefer an $9 vacuum cleaner instead of an $199 one with the same characteristics, even if the former is streaming some data. They let Amazon Echo and Samsung SmartTVs to be on their network. What else do you want me to prove here? | Töma Gavrichenkov | gpg: 2deb 97b1 0a3c 151d b67f 1ee5 00e7 94bc 4d08 9191 | mailto: ximaera at gmail.com | fb: ximaera | telegram: xima_era | skype: xima_era | tel. no: +7 916 515 49 58
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] "The Internet of Threats: Fighting FUD with MUD"
- Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] serious vulnerabilities FreeRTOS
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]