[iot-wg] "The Internet of Threats: Fighting FUD with MUD"

[This time with feeling- to everyone]

Dear Marco and other colleagues,


On 19.10.18 17:23, Marco Davids wrote:
> That is why I believe in some additional 'MUD-features', such as
> restricting bandwidth (not every fridge needs 100Mbit/s), or restricting
> access to the internet only on certain hours of the day.

I would like to bring to your attention a new draft:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lear-opsawg-mud-bw-profile/

The purpose of this draft is to describe the behavior of devices that
are MUD-capable in terms of bandwidth utilization.  You will note that
the draft is marked as experimental.  We can change this designation,
depending on how the work progresses.  I have already received several
comments on ways in which the model can be simplified, and several
comments on how it can be otherwise improved, having only published it a
few days ago. 

This having been said, I solicit your thoughts and comments.  In particular:

  * How might we assist manufacturers in completing this aspect of the
    MUD file?
  * What are we missing?
  * Is the classification approach (ACLs) correct?

Eliot

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/iot-wg/attachments/20181024/17aa9cb5/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/iot-wg/attachments/20181024/17aa9cb5/attachment.sig>