This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[iot-wg] IoT traffic and implicit consent
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] "The Internet of Threats: Fighting FUD with MUD"
- Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] "The Internet of Threats: Fighting FUD with MUD"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Tue Oct 23 16:32:24 CEST 2018
> On 22 Oct 2018, at 22:29, Michael Richardson <mcr at sandelman.ca> wrote: > >> BTW, Jelte spoke about the SPIN project at the WG meeting in >> Marseille. It was a revelation to see how much data was being sent >> outside his home network from its IoT devices. [And on a related note, >> why does my DVD player call the mothership and what data are being >> exchanged?] > > It's not a DVD player. It's a Transformer Robot hiding in your house. Well, it was a robot. Then it turned into a DVD player. :-) Or was it the other way round? :-) No matter. The point I was trying to make is that it’s very rare to be properly informed about the traffic IoT devices generate or why. Manufacturers generally don’t volunteer that information. From that PoV a DVD player is no different from a smart lightbulb or a transformer robot. I naively assumed my DVD player might check for new firmware from time to time. But it’s doing a lot more than that and one of these days I’ll get around to finding out exactly what it’s doing.
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] "The Internet of Threats: Fighting FUD with MUD"
- Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] "The Internet of Threats: Fighting FUD with MUD"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]