This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/iot-wg@ripe.net/

[iot-wg] serious vulnerabilities FreeRTOS

Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] serious vulnerabilities FreeRTOS

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jelte ripe at tjeb.nl
Tue Oct 23 10:28:55 CEST 2018

On 10/23/18 3:04 AM, Töma Gavrichenkov wrote:
> 
> Sometimes the publicly available TCP handling code might seem to be
> too slow and bloated for an embedded software. Embedded developers are
> used to get rid of the security checks they believe are unnecessary,
> because it reduces both computational time and memory footprint.
> 

Battery life is an oft-cited concern as well. And to be fair, those 
concerns, by themselves, are not invalid. So one question is, do they 
need 'full stack' TCP/IP? Could there be a lighter protocol they could 
be using? Is there any way to get them there?

Okay, that's three questions.

Jelte

Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] serious vulnerabilities FreeRTOS

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ iot-wg Archives ]