This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/iot-wg@ripe.net/
[iot-wg] "The Internet of Threats: Fighting FUD with MUD"
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] "The Internet of Threats: Fighting FUD with MUD"
- Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] "The Internet of Threats: Fighting FUD with MUD"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Marco Hogewoning
marcoh at ripe.net
Mon Oct 22 10:27:08 CEST 2018
> On 22 Oct 2018, at 00:29, Jelte Jansen <ripe at tjeb.nl> wrote: > > The biggest 'whoa what the' moment you can get, by the way, if you can show an Amazon Echo owner that Amazon stores -and you can play back Which might lead to other “interesting directions” re. storage of personal data for prolonged period of time. Consider the old phone sales, where the conversation is recorded as proof of a contract entered or consent being given. Can imagine that by the time you can tell your algorithmic assistant to order and buy stuff, a similar need arises; need a way to keep record of the order for legal purposes. For the purpose of MUD less relevant, you either have the channel and can make the purchase or it gets blocked and you don’t. But in terms of what to expect or what is “allowable behaviour” probably something to keep in mind. MarcoH
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] "The Internet of Threats: Fighting FUD with MUD"
- Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] "The Internet of Threats: Fighting FUD with MUD"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]