[iot-wg] another heave on the co-chair selection procedure

On 10/9/18 4:27 PM, Jim Reid wrote:
> It’s uncomfortable to do this when the WG has argely been silent about how the leadership is selected.
> 

the WG (or at the very least the list) has been pretty silent, period.

> So could you please indicate your support or opposition to the following? Thanks.
> 

I support this process.


> 
> (1) The IoT WG will have 2 co-chairs who serve staggered 2-year terms.
> (2) A co-chair cannot serve more than 3 consecutive terms.
> (3) Each year, the longest serving co-chair will stand down and subject to (2) may make themselves available for re-appointment.
> (4) The incoming co-chair will be chosen by the WG using consensus and the remaining co-chair will make the consensus determination.
> (5) Any circumstances not covered by the above will be resolved by the RIPE Chair whose  decision will be final.
> 


Jelte