[iot-wg] Consensus on WG Chair Selection process

It's time to declare victory. So that's what I am doing. :-)

IMO we have consensus and enough support for the selection process. My thanks to everyone who contributed to the discussion.

There is one small tweak to the original text. Peter Koch suggested a clarification which got rid of an ambiguity: replacing "longest-serving co-chair" with "co-chair whose term is up". That's reflected in the text below.

I will ask the NCC to put this on the WG's home page and also turn it into a RIPE document.

(1) The IoT WG will have 2 co-chairs who serve staggered 2-year terms.
(2) A co-chair cannot serve more than 3 consecutive terms.
(3) Each year, the co-chair whose term is up will stand down and subject to (2) may make themselves available for re-appointment.
(4) The incoming co-chair will be chosen by the WG using consensus and the remaining co-chair will make the consensus determination.
(5) Any circumstances not covered by the above will be resolved by the RIPE Chair whose  decision will be final.