This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[iot-wg] Fwd: [ipv6-wg] Invitation to supply feedback on ITU draft Recommendation on IPv6 address planning for IoT

• Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] Fwd: [ipv6-wg] Invitation to supply feedback on ITU draft Recommendation on IPv6 address planning for IoT
• Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] Agenda items for RIPE76

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Jim Reid jim at rfc1035.com
Mon Mar 26 11:47:29 CEST 2018

> On 26 Mar 2018, at 10:32, Michael J. Oghia <mike.oghia at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> You might want to follow up with Sander about this. 

*Please* take further (peripheral) discussion of draft Recommendation Y.IPv6RefModel to the IPv6 WG. There’s no reason to drag the IoT WG into that discussion (or cc our list) and quite a few reasons not to do that.

BTW Sander’s not one of the IPv6 WG co-chairs. Benedikt, Jen and Raymond are. And while Sander obviously knows a lot about IPv6, there is even more expertise in the IPv6 WG.

Note the Reply-to: header on this email.

• Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] Fwd: [ipv6-wg] Invitation to supply feedback on ITU draft Recommendation on IPv6 address planning for IoT
• Next message (by thread): [iot-wg] Agenda items for RIPE76

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ iot-wg Archives ]