[iot-wg] Fwd: [ipv6-wg] Invitation to supply feedback on ITU draft Recommendation on IPv6 address planning for IoT

> On 22 Mar 2018, at 13:33, Michael J. Oghia <mike.oghia at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> This might be relevant to this list as well. 

Please keep the discussion of draft Recommendation Y.IPv6RefModel on the IPv6 WG's list. It's of course perfectly fine to tell the IoT WG that that discussion is taking place there. But it will be confusing if discussion of that document takes place in two WGs. And it may also lead to needless duplication/overlap. Let's not do that.

It's also important that the IPv6 WG is the focus for this effort. There's an elaborate choreography going on behind the scenes with liaison statements and invitations flowing between SG20 and the IPv6 WG. If we introduce this WG into that dance, it will create problems that are easily avoided. SG20 expects to hear from our IPv6 WG about their draft recommendation. If IoT gets involved, someone's going to have a lot of explaining to do to our friends in Geneva: probably me.