This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[iot-discussion] the IoT WG charter

• Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] the IoT WG charter

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Niall O'Reilly niall.oreilly at ucd.ie
Fri Sep 29 10:51:23 CEST 2017

On 28 Sep 2017, at 16:22, Jim Reid wrote:

> I think this is much more suitable and support Peter’s text.
   I agree.

> Though we could lose “operational and beyond” from the last bullet 
> point.
   I have no strong feelings either way on this point.

   /Niall

• Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] the IoT WG charter

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ iot-wg Archives ]