This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/iot-wg@ripe.net/
[iot-discussion] the IoT WG charter
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] the IoT WG charter
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Niall O'Reilly
niall.oreilly at ucd.ie
Fri Sep 29 10:51:23 CEST 2017
On 28 Sep 2017, at 16:22, Jim Reid wrote: > I think this is much more suitable and support Peter’s text. I agree. > Though we could lose “operational and beyond” from the last bullet > point. I have no strong feelings either way on this point. /Niall
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] the IoT WG charter
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]