[iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group

I agree. A very good starting point.

> On 12 May 2017, at 10:22, Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 11 May 2017, at 17:26, Peter Koch <pk at DENIC.DE> wrote:
>> 
>> While there is no shortage on IoT fora/consortia etc, I agree that
>> a venue on the topic of "IoT" in the RIPE community is useful
>> 
>> o to discuss challenges and opportunities of "IoT" for
>> the RIPE community
>> 
>> o to serve as a focal point for the NCC regarding community
>> input to their IoT activities, including liaisons
>> 
>> o to invite IoT communities to for a dialogue on matters
>> of operational relevance, including security, the numbering
>> system, and applicability of standards
>> 
>> o to develop positions of the RIPE community on IoT matters,
>> operational and beyond
> 
> Peter, I think this is very close to what the proposed WG's charter should be.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> iot-discussion mailing list
> iot-discussion at ripe.net
> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-discussion