This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/iot-wg@ripe.net/
[iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Peter Koch
pk at DENIC.DE
Thu May 11 18:26:04 CEST 2017
Gordon, thanks for your thoughtful response. > I believe we need an IOT WG. While there is no shortage on IoT fora/consortia etc, I agree that a venue on the topic of "IoT" in the RIPE community is useful o to discuss challenges and opportunities of "IoT" for the RIPE community o to serve as a focal point for the NCC regarding community input to their IoT activities, including liaisons o to invite IoT communities to for a dialogue on matters of operational relevance, including security, the numbering system, and applicability of standards o to develop positions of the RIPE community on IoT matters, operational and beyond > And not just an IOT Security WG. Even if the initial emphasis may be on security. Sure, just the item list was to be seen in context of its genesis. -Peter
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]