This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jelte Jansen
ripe at tjeb.nl
Wed May 10 15:35:55 CEST 2017
On 2017-05-09 19:28, Anna Wilson wrote: > Hello all, > > At the IoT BoF this evening, there was positive discussion about forming > a working group. Some volunteers got together after the meeting to start > to hammer out a charter. This is what we came up with. > > Draft: > > The Internet of Things working group will work on the areas of: > - what role do service providers want to play > - what role can service providers play > - what do we need from manufacturers > - engaging with governments and regulators > - educating stakeholders > - recommendations for vendors, service providers, end users and relevant > stakeholders > I am fine with this as a proto-charter. BTW, that last point reminded me of https://thedigitalstandard.org which may or may not be something we want to keep track of / be involved in too Jelte
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]