[iot-discussion] Proto-charter for IoT working group

Jim, Anna, and everybody else who showed up,

Apologies for the lack of seats, we knew it was going to be popular, but this was beyond expectations.

Thanks to everybody who contributed, I think the message below indeed captures the outcome of the discussion and the way forward.

My colleague Suzanne took quite extensive notes, we will try and publish a summary as soon as possible,

As Paul Rendek already mentioned during the session, the RIPE NCC will do anything to assist in this process. Please feel free to contact me or one of my other colleagues from the External Relations team if there are specific things that needs to be done.

Looking forward to Friday’s plenary and hopefully a continuation of the positive spirit we had going yesterday.

Regards,

Marco Hogewoning
-- 
External Relations - RIPE NCC

> On 10 May 2017, at 10:40, Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 9 May 2017, at 18:28, Anna Wilson <anna.wilson at heanet.ie> wrote:
>> 
>> Draft:
>> 
>> The Internet of Things working group will work on the areas of:
>> - what role do service providers want to play
>> - what role can service providers play
>> - what do we need from manufacturers
>> - engaging with governments and regulators
>> - educating stakeholders
>> - recommendations for vendors, service providers, end users and relevant stakeholders
> 
> Many thanks for this Anna.
> 
> I think this v0.1 draft of the charter is good enough to be present at the plenary on Friday.
> 
> Note to everyone else: the above text is *not* the WG charter. It's a starting point to discuss and formalise a charter in time for RIPE75. ie On Friday, someone will say "We're thinking of creating an IoT WG and here's a very rough outline of what its charter might be and what we think the WG will do. Can we get approval for this?" That way, the WG will be up and running by Dubai. If we have to finalise the charter first, the WG will not be created until RIPE76 at the earliest. We agreed at last night's BoF that we couldn't wait that long.
> 
> I hope any further comments on the draft Anna circulated will focus on showstoppers: for instance important topics or objectives which have been missed from the list above.
> _______________________________________________
> iot-discussion mailing list
> iot-discussion at ripe.net
> https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/iot-discussion