This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[iot-wg] mailing list etiquette
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] Second Part of RIPE Atlas as IoT Devices - The RIPE Atlas Architecture
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Sat Dec 23 09:11:02 CET 2017
What’s this? Have we been teleported back to the late 1980s? :-) Could I remind everyone to use meaningful and relevant Subject: headers when posting to the mailing list. In particular, *PLEASE* do not reply to message digests. It’s inconsiderate and unhelpful to reply to message digests. So don’t do that. Thanks. Replies to message digests create unnecessary and easily avoided problems. Here are the main ones: [1] It messes up the article threading used by everybody’s mail clients. [2] It’s not clear which message(s) in the digest are being replied to. [3] The list archives contain completely useless Subject: headers (like "iot-wg Digest, Vol X, Issue Y”) which make it difficult when browsing the archives to find out who said what and when. Item [3] becomes a real nuisance if/when there’s a need to consult the list archives to verify a consensus decision or review the development of things such as policy proposals.
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-wg] Second Part of RIPE Atlas as IoT Devices - The RIPE Atlas Architecture
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]