This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/

[iot-discussion] Proposed US legislation

Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proposed US legislation
Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proposed US legislation

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Patrik Fältström paf at frobbit.se
Wed Aug 9 07:59:17 CEST 2017

On 8 Aug 2017, at 16:01, Marco Hogewoning wrote:

> Still on the fence whether this can only be solved by hard regulation and liability or whether we as industry can still create enough of a cultural shift to “do the right thing” under our own momentum.

Require just like in other environmental discussions (glass recycling etc) that the manufacturers present a responsibility/management process for the whole lifecycle of the "thing", and we will be done. Including destruction, recycling of material etc.

   paf
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 203 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/iot-wg/attachments/20170809/2b82179b/attachment.sig>

Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proposed US legislation
Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Proposed US legislation

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ iot-wg Archives ]