This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/[email protected]/
[iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Jim Reid
jim at rfc1035.com
Thu Apr 20 12:01:38 CEST 2017
> On 20 Apr 2017, at 10:53, Marco Hogewoning <marcoh at ripe.net> wrote: > >> >> Minor nit perhaps: "what your access provider can and should be allowed to do about these problems"? >> >> I'm not sure we'd want access providers to have control over what web cams (or whatever) someone wants to install on their home network. > > But you probably would he offended if they do not cut off that spammer or the person that is sending your DNS server a few million queries a second. Indeed. Though that's not the same thing as giving access providers some influence or stake in their CPE customers can install. > They should not have an opinion about connecting a webcam, but what about me hosting a Command & Control server? Nuke it from orbit. Just to be sure. :-) But suppose that webcam is the c&c server. And how would anyone know that?
- Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
- Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] What role does the SP play in protecting consumers re IoT?
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
[ iot-wg Archives ]