This archive is retained to ensure existing URLs remain functional. It will not contain any emails sent to this mailing list after July 1, 2024. For all messages, including those sent before and after this date, please visit the new location of the archive at https://mailman.ripe.net/archives/list/iot-wg@ripe.net/

[iot-discussion] Regulating the IoT

Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Regulating the IoT
Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Regulating the IoT

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Gordon Lennox gordon.lennox.13 at gmail.com
Tue Nov 22 16:05:15 CET 2016

I think you can already guess my response.

Regulation will happen. Individual organisations and experts from within
the community will probably be involved somehow. But I think the RIPE
community as such should be involved. If not we will effectively leave it
to other groups such as ETNO, GSMA and so on.

If you do not involved then you cannot really complain afterwards.

Gordon

On 22 November 2016 at 05:51, Shane Kerr <shane at time-travellers.org> wrote:

> Gordon,
>
> He's not wrong. But is there a path to reasonable regulation? Can RIPE
> help facilitate this in any way?
>
> ////snip

> Cheers,
>
> --
> Shane
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </ripe/mail/archives/iot-wg/attachments/20161122/566d98e5/attachment.html>

Previous message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Regulating the IoT
Next message (by thread): [iot-discussion] Regulating the IoT

Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

[ iot-wg Archives ]