<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<title>Re: [enum-wg] DNS Server</title>
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0in;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0in;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Well it should not be too surprising. Though this list is generally
oriented toward classic RFC 3761 using e164.arpa though most of us know that
that the use of 3761 in private instantiations is doing very well indeed and multiple
carriers are looking at various forms of DNS server implementations than can
support ENUM.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>I curious as to what other open source implementations could
support 3761 especially in large scale cached environments.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Cheers ..<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>The other IETF ENUM WG co-chair …until the IETF shuts it down.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style='border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt'>
<div>
<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'>
<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'> Lupton, Ronan
[mailto:ronan.lupton@ie.verizonbusiness.com] <br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, January 20, 2009 4:57 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> richard@shockey.us; jim@rfc1035.com; ihtraum18@gmail.com<br>
<b>Cc:</b> enum-wg@ripe.net<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [enum-wg] DNS Server<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p style='margin-bottom:12.0pt'><span style='font-size:10.0pt'>Oh, activity on
this list again, amazing. Just when we thought things were quiet!<br>
<br>
Ronan<br>
<br>
<br>
----- Original Message -----<br>
From: enum-wg-admin@ripe.net <enum-wg-admin@ripe.net><br>
To: 'Jim Reid' <jim@rfc1035.com>; 'Eduardo Júnior'
<ihtraum18@gmail.com><br>
Cc: enum-wg@ripe.net <enum-wg@ripe.net><br>
Sent: Tue Jan 20 21:12:09 2009<br>
Subject: RE: [enum-wg] DNS Server<br>
<br>
I'm curious is it in Unbound as well?<br>
<br>
> -----Original Message-----<br>
> From: enum-wg-admin@ripe.net [<a href="mailto:enum-wg-admin@ripe.net">mailto:enum-wg-admin@ripe.net</a>]
On Behalf<br>
> Of Jim Reid<br>
> Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2009 2:56 PM<br>
> To: Eduardo Júnior<br>
> Cc: enum-wg@ripe.net<br>
> Subject: Re: [enum-wg] DNS Server<br>
> <br>
> On Jan 20, 2009, at 19:30, Eduardo Júnior wrote:<br>
> <br>
> > I read which it´s possible implementing a DNS Server which
support<br>
> > ENUM with PowerDNS.<br>
> > Is it possible with Bind?<br>
> <br>
> Yes. ENUM is a protocol for mapping E.164 telephone numbers into<br>
> domain names under e164.arpa. It's does have an impact on the DNS<br>
> protocol or its implementation. ENUM lookups generally return NAPTR<br>
> records. These are supported in just about every modern DNS<br>
> implementation. BIND is the reference DNS implementation so by<br>
> definition it supports NAPTR records. :-)</span><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><br>
<br>
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif"'>Verizon Ireland
Limited – registered in Ireland – registered number 224334 – registered office
at Erne Street, Dublin 2, Ireland – VAT number 8224334A</span><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>