[enum-wg] insert meaningless and irrelevant Subject header

the issue is still percentage of analog networks in Russia

We estimated 10 years ago - but it still a problem to implement fixed-mobile NP

On 13 Nov 2013, at 23:32, Nikolay Shopik <shopik at inblock.ru> wrote:

> On 13.11.2013 22:47, Richard Shockey wrote:
>> BTW the focus in the US now is on using closed ENUM systems it for all IP
>> [SIP/IMS] interconnection data among carriers since everyone including the
>> mobile operators want to junk their TDM/SS7 gear and Public Key
>> Infrastructure for signing the inbound E.164 number in the INVITE to
>> validate the origin call and combat Call Spoofing etc. 
> 
> We are lagging behind, for like 5-7 years. MNP only apply to mobile
> operators, local operators will still using TDM/SS7 and nowhere plan to
> junk their stuff. That's probably because our FSB didn't come up with
> new wiretapping technology for SIP/IMS yet. So they still need TDM to
> wiretap calls.
> 
> SIP/IMS and public key, can you point me to draft/rfc?
>