[enum-wg] insert meaningless and irrelevant Subject header
Dmitry Burkov dburk at burkov.aha.ru
Wed Nov 13 19:16:00 CET 2013
The solution will be provided by Mediafon http://www.mediafon.lt/Number-portability-solution-860.html Operator - ZNIIS - Central institute for research in telecommunications http://www.zniis.ru/bdpn/documents It is about MNP But it was already deployed http://www.mediafon.lt/Number-portability-experience-862.html Dmitry On 13 Nov 2013, at 21:55, Richard Shockey <richard at shockey.us> wrote: > Yep .. that what everyone is doing .. Interesting that RU is using a closed > system if for M-LNP. > > > Who BTW is running the RU system? > > -----Original Message----- > From: enum-wg-bounces at ripe.net [mailto:enum-wg-bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf > Of Nikolay Shopik > Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 11:16 AM > To: Sander Steffann > Cc: RIPE ENUM WG > Subject: Re: [enum-wg] insert meaningless and irrelevant Subject header > > On 13.11.2013 19:24, Sander Steffann wrote: >> Obviously not: there is more traffic on this mailing list now than there > has been in years! ;-) > > Many people just silently using ENUM, that's it ;). > >> From what I heard Russian MNP (which is should start at December) are > using closed ENUM. > >
[ enum-wg Archives ]