[enum-wg] insert meaningless and irrelevant Subject header

Hey thanks for the info!  Good to hear sounds like a great cost effective
solution. The carriers in the US have always cached the NANP LNP data in
localized ENUM boxes, typically from NetNumber. 

BTW the focus in the US now is on using closed ENUM systems it for all IP
[SIP/IMS] interconnection data among carriers since everyone including the
mobile operators want to junk their TDM/SS7 gear and Public Key
Infrastructure for signing the inbound E.164 number in the INVITE to
validate the origin call and combat Call Spoofing etc. 

It's an old rule of technology .. Once the hype stops .. it's a sure sign A.
the technology is dead or B. Its fully deploying.  :-) 

-----Original Message-----
From: Dmitry Burkov [mailto:dburk at burkov.aha.ru] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 1:16 PM
To: Richard Shockey
Cc: Nikolay Shopik; Sander Steffann; RIPE ENUM WG
Subject: Re: [enum-wg] insert meaningless and irrelevant Subject header

The solution will be provided by Mediafon
http://www.mediafon.lt/Number-portability-solution-860.html


Operator - ZNIIS - Central institute for research in telecommunications
http://www.zniis.ru/bdpn/documents

It is about MNP 
But it was already deployed
http://www.mediafon.lt/Number-portability-experience-862.html


Dmitry

On 13 Nov 2013, at 21:55, Richard Shockey <richard at shockey.us> wrote:

> Yep .. that what everyone is doing .. Interesting that RU is using a
closed
> system if for M-LNP.  
> 
> 
> Who BTW is running the RU system? 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: enum-wg-bounces at ripe.net [mailto:enum-wg-bounces at ripe.net] On Behalf
> Of Nikolay Shopik
> Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2013 11:16 AM
> To: Sander Steffann
> Cc: RIPE ENUM WG
> Subject: Re: [enum-wg] insert meaningless and irrelevant Subject header
> 
> On 13.11.2013 19:24, Sander Steffann wrote:
>> Obviously not: there is more traffic on this mailing list now than there
> has been in years! ;-)
> 
> Many people just silently using ENUM, that's it ;).
> 
>> From what I heard Russian MNP (which is should start at December) are
> using closed ENUM.
> 
>