[enum-wg] The ENUM Federation: activities, website etc.
Carsten Schiefner enumvoipsip.cs at schiefner.de
Wed Aug 29 09:02:17 CEST 2012
Richard, John - but isn't this - "telephony" using IP - and/or a transition to it happening right now, at this very moment anyways? Regardless if there is a certain ENUM flavour being used for it or not? So what I am asking is whether ENUM really makes the difference in "encouraging assumptions or debates about why ITU should have control over peering and routing policies and perhaps even authorization of carriers and services", as John has stated. Best, Carsten On 28.08.2012 16:37, Richard Shockey wrote: > [RS> ] John .. I totally agree but the odd thing is that 6116 as a carrier > numbering database technology is working and working pretty well. The new > driver is the end of TDM and SS7 signaling. The Class X gear in the network > is literally starting to crumble. The PSTN, at least in North America, is > clearly evolving into the Public SIP Network. You are absolutely correct > that this is starting to complicate the WCIT discussion. If "telephony" is > using IP then ITU-T thinks its theirs.
[ enum-wg Archives ]