[enum-wg] ENUM Trial - Validation Processes of ENUM Registrants

Hi Miguel,

On 01.06.2011 13:43, Miguel Duarte wrote:
> [...]
>
> So all experience, implemented scenarios and/or ideas you might want to
> share/discuss are more than welcome.

the following describes in a nutshell how DENIC, the ENUM registry for 
Germany's +49 telephone numbers does it:

. It is the foremost duty of the ENUM registrant to keep the DENIC 
member (aka. ENUM registrar) and DENIC up to date at all times wrt. the 
status of the ENUM delegation of a certain telephone number

. DENIC does not mandate any particular method(s) for (re-) validation

. It is essentially the ENUM registrar that needs to devise a robust 
method for (re-) validation, whatever it is in detail: copies of phone 
bills, SMS tokens in case of mobile numbers etc.

. The last positive validation exercise for a certain number must not be 
older than 12 months

. The ENUM registrar is the recored keeper of all such positive 
validation proves

(Cf. http://www.denic.de/en/enum/registration-and-update/validation.html)

Second to this, DENIC devised a COMPLAINT process:

. This aims at solving issues with numbers where eg. at least at first 
sight, the holder of a telephone number is not the registrant of the 
correspondig ENUM domain

(Cf. http://www.denic.de/en/enum/complaint.html)

The general entry point for all ENUM related information on DENIC's 
website in English is:

http://www.denic.de/en/enum/

Hope that helps - happy to answer any further question you might be having.

All the best,

	Carsten