[#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter?
Christian de Larrinaga cdel at firsthand.net
Tue Jun 30 17:46:28 CEST 2009
ENUM is neither a product nor a service. ENUM is a protocol. There are already per dip models carriers pay for registry dips but this is really beside the point as a adopting a single revenue model won't drive adoption of ENUM. I think I should also note that in my view ENUM is not a carrier play ENUM is not a user play but ENUM could be a very useful Regulator play. To suggest just three useful features that ENUM brings for Regulators. a/ ENUM enables reachability over both IP and TDM networks using a single numbering resource. b/ ENUM registry contains dynamic information about numbering resources under the Regulator's sphere which is valuable to regulator and market dynamics. c/ ENUM offers support for implementing services that underpin a regulatory role for universal service obligations as communications move across both IP and TDM networks. For example number portability. Trying to link ENUM to any particular financial model is counter productive. Each market participant can decide for themselves how or why they might leverage ENUM. But they can only do this if it is implemented. So the Regulator should allocate all numbers with ENUM. Then the Regulator will underpin universal service and seed both critical mass and low per unit cost. This is vital as users with numbers will pay in the end. Will it be used? Who knows. Carriers may start to look at ENUM as a simple way to enhance how they offer edge based routing to optimise their bilateral relationships with customer configurable services. That could be a game changer. Of course customers unhappy with carrier services may use ENUM to route around choke points but then they can do that today using IP directly at least where carriers don't add latency and filtering to their IP access networks. Christian Christian de Larrinaga On 30 Jun 2009, at 16:13, Rui Ribeiro wrote: > Another strange ideia... > > What if operators receive back money from ENUM registers... what if > the ENUM Registry pays 30% or 40% to the operators that make lookups > on the tree? It might be pinouts... may not. The "driver" for > operators will be to get some revenue from the ENUM tree it self > becoming a source of income. (don't flame me... just giving ideias to > the discussion). > > Rui Ribeiro > racribeiro at gmail.com >
[ enum-wg Archives ]