[#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business c ase matter?

Hi

crue is not currently deployed within the uk - there is some debate about whether the 'carriers' in the uk are not loading the database for technical or commercial reasons.

If it is the case that paying for each individual end user registration is just to expensive for a CP to bulk load, then whether a computer program loads blocks of naptr records or a million individual ones, is, in my opinion, irrelivant, and we just need to fix the registry business model.

Cheers
Peter

Ukec director who owns a voip provider who is looking for the enum business case!



--- original message ---
From: Carsten Schiefner <enumvoipsip.cs at schiefner.de>
Subject: Re: [#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case  matter?
Date: 22nd July 2009
Time: 11:47:27 am

Hello Christian,

Christian de Larrinaga wrote:
>> Coudl you please elaborate a bit here? Do you call for regulators to 
>> make ENUM mandatory?
> 
> I am saying that when an E.164 is allocated (to an operator) by a 
> regulator it should be entered into the ENUM tree even it simply returns 
> the tel: uri for the number itself.

I see: like the CRUE principle (http://www.ukec.co.uk/docs/CRUE.pdf) 
deployed in the UK tree 4.4.e164.arpa - am I correct?

Best regards,

	Carsten