[#XWM-610908]: Re: [enum-wg] ENUM Adoption - Does a business case matter?

Hello Christian,

Christian de Larrinaga wrote:
>> Coudl you please elaborate a bit here? Do you call for regulators to 
>> make ENUM mandatory?
> 
> I am saying that when an E.164 is allocated (to an operator) by a 
> regulator it should be entered into the ENUM tree even it simply returns 
> the tel: uri for the number itself.

I see: like the CRUE principle (http://www.ukec.co.uk/docs/CRUE.pdf) 
deployed in the UK tree 4.4.e164.arpa - am I correct?

Best regards,

	Carsten